Fascinating title – cool author name

Peons - new Amazon cover

Review by amselbird *****

When I first saw the name D-PAK, I thought this was some kind of a sequel to the movie with Kevin Spacey. Then I realized that it was actually the name of the author. The actual title of the book – EVEN PEONS ARE PEOPLE is certainly captivating: an assertion of the essential inherent worth of every person and thus of the values of any decent society. In the context of this story, it has to do with the fact that a man at the bottom of the food chain in this futuristic society is on trial for capital murder and finds that all that stands between him and the death penalty is a young lawyer whose enthusiasm is not not dampened by his lack of experience.

The plot of the book concerns the effort of the dedicated young defense lawyer to save his “space hobo” client from the death penalty after the client killed someone in a typically science fiction way. Although the crime itself is pretty clear-cut, a great deal of mystery surrounds the why and the wherefore. There are also the kind of political shenanigans that we would expect from a John Grisham, but played out in an environment more worthy of Robert Heinlein.
Notwithstanding the unusual method of murder at the beginning of the book, I’m sure that this story could have been told with a contemporary setting – or even an historical one. But that is the point about good stories – they are timeless.

All in all I enjoyed it and would recommend it.

Another review by an Amazon customer

Peons - new Amazon coverPeons - latest Amazon coverEven Peons are People - CreateSpace cover

A customer review of Even Peons are People: Interplanetary Justice.

This book seduced and lured me into a realistic and credible future world. While none of the science here is truly unique or completely original – limb regrowth, telepathy, space travel, etc – there are some clever aspects to the story that gave me something to think about. For example, in this future society they have the death penalty for aggravated murder, but with a clever, or even ingenious, twist. The twist is that if the accused is found guilty, sentenced to death and then found to be innocent after execution, the jury who found the accused guilty are then themselves sentenced to death under what they call the “sauce for the gander rule.” The premise behind the rule, the author explains, is that if a person is prepared to stake the life of another human being on his own judgement and that of his fellow jurors, then that juror should be ready to stake his or her OWN life on that same fallible human judgement. Although the author appears to be an atheist – he parodies religion in parts of the story – this rule comes over as a kind of updating of the Christian theme of “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.”

D-PAK shows in this book that even in a wealthy world, rich in material and advanced technology, it is still possible to tell a story about people using technology as backdrop rather than the main character. That is probably why I really enjoyed this book so much.

Another review

Another review – this one by sbrKaye – reprinted with the kind permission of the author.


First of all, let me say that I’m not, generally speaking, a big Science Fiction fan. However, I decided to read “Even Peons Are People” after it was enthusiastically recommended by a good friend who knows my tastes very well. And I have to say, I’m rather glad I stepped out of my comfort zone, because despite being set in a dystopic future universe, in which rich, spoiled young men race around asteroids on their rocketRiders, and mindSpeak with their friends rather than send text messages, where paparazzi (known as “svengalis”) use invisibility attire (or stealthwear) to stalk their celebrity prey and acquire information by hacking other people’s open brainWaves, and where lawbreaking is punished by a stretch in a timeOut Center, this book is, basically, a very good detective story/legal drama.

I can easily envisage this story transferred to the Big Screen. The action starts from the very beginning, with an exciting asteroidSlalom which ends in sudden death. From there, we have all the twists and turns that one would expect from a political thriller, in which nothing is what it seems. More deaths follow and it is a while before the connection between them becomes clear. I don’t want to say too much, as I don’t want to give away the plot.

And no – asteroidSlalom is not a proofreading error (in the language of the book itself, I should probably say “proofReading”). One of the charms of this book for me was the way the author has created a whole new language, partly based (so my techie friends tell me) on the practices of computer programmers. Thus, the book’s hero, the young and idealistic Thiery Wallace, is not a Defence Counsel, but a defenderAdvocate, judges (or adjudicators, as they are called in this strange, new world) are addressed as “Your Seriousness” and time is measured in units as small as mibiNeuts.

Even the author’s name, D Pak, recalls beloved icons of Science Fiction, such as the Vulcans T’Pol and T’Pring in Gene Roddenberry’s popular TV franchise.

And a word about the title: “Even Peons Are People”. A peon is an unskilled labourer, or serf – and, at first glance, one would assume that it refers to the fact that Thiery’s client is a poor spaceHobo (or indigentItinerant). But the word “peon” also sounds like the word “pawn”, and, as such, points up the sorry fact that, in D Pak’s dystopic universe, even in the 41st century, the poor, the powerless, those without the right connections, are still pawns in the dirty games played by the rich, the powerful and the politically connected.

So, whether you are a Science Fiction fan, or prefer legal dramas, detective stories or political thrillers, I think you will enjoy this book as much as I did.

Even Peons are People

Even Peons are People is the first book in the Interplanetary Justice series, set in a world of space travel and against a background of interplanetary law. The hero of the series is one Thiery Wallace, a young space travelling lawyer (or “defender Advocate” in the language of the saga) operating in a solar system in which telepathy, invisibility clothing, virtual communication, space travel, space hobos, virtual courts and floating trays that can navigate their way along corridors bearing pots of “hotCaf” are all normal, even commonplace.

It is set two thousand years in the future, after the planet Jupiter has been dismantled by thermonuclear fusion and its heavy element debris turned into some 300 earth sized planets around the solar system – not to mention millions of space stations, many of them privately owned. In this world, space travel is as common as overseas holidays – even though people can quite easily use virtual communication to do most of their work from home.

In the first story in the series, Thiery Wallace – a young defender advocate on the planet Vespasian – is appointed by a virtual court (or vCourt for short) to defend a space hobo (a kind of indigent space travelling itinerant) against a charge of murdering a fellow space hobo by deliberately getting him sucked out of an airlock of a space station devoted to hedonistic pursuits. (The method he uses to thwart the hi-tech safeguards is actually quite ingenious – putting HAL to shame!) After a brief virtual communication (vConf) with the space hobo using brainChip-enhanced telepathy, Thiery takes on the case.

However, what starts off as an open and shut case proves to be something a lot more sinister as earth intelligence and politicians start getting involved. And while the earth leadership relies on telepathy to communicate their instructions, their space travelling executioner (Golam) shows up on Vespasian in person. The case appears to be connected to the recent death of a crown prince of a monarchy planet (Summanus) in an accident at an exclusive space station resort during an asteroid slalom. The incident was witnessed by an earthling called Telford. Telford is a svengali – a sort of paparazzo of this space travel era, who makes his living eavesdropping on the telepathy and virtual communications of the rich and famous, cloaked in invisibility attire or “stealthWear.”

But why are earth politicians interfering in a seemingly minor case concerning the mere peons of society on another planet? And why have they sent a space travelling killer to silence the space hobo – and possibly also Thiery himself? What are they afraid of? And will the space hobo even make it to the virtual court alive?

D-PAK does not get overly technical in his descriptions of telepathy and virtual communications. Indeed a lot of the technical explanations are presented in end notes. But he/she makes it clear that the telepathy and virtual communications are based on a microchip brain-implant – and thus rooted firmly in science. In contrast D-PAK offers no technical description of invisibility – although again it is clear that it is science and technology based. But one area where D-PAK does explain – albeit in an endnote – is in the realm of transport and space travel. Thus we learn the difference between an in-the-atmosphere hoverCar and a spaceHopper that can engage in true space travel.

This book is the first in a series called Interplanetary Justice, about Thiery Wallace and his defence of the accused in various cases in the solar system, whether set on a single planet or involving space travel between planets.

Even the title is beguiling

The following is a review of Even Peons are People: Interplanetary Justice
published on amazon.co.uk, reprinted here with the kind permission of the reviewer.


There is something particularly satisfying in finding a book that has an intriguing and promising title that leaves you wondering what to expect. And so I read this book without any particular expectation, but with a profound hope that it wouldn’t let me down. I’m pleased to say that it didn’t. Over the course of nearly a 100,000 words, I found myself being mystified, surprised, confused, enlightened and mystified again, etc. The author certainly knows how to toy with the reader. At times it could be quite frustrating. But that is how it is with any true mystery, whether a Conan Doyle or a P D James.

But this is also sci fi – a genre that I don’t usually read. I hear others talk about Clarke and Heinlein and Asimov and Dick and Wynham, but with the exception of the last, I’ve never yet taken up the challenge to join the party. So this book was in many ways an eye-opener to a genre that I have neglected until now

I won’t call it a classic because it neither pretends not aspires to be. But it is gripping, thrilling and entertaining. And most importantly, it may yet make a convert of me to this new (to me) genre.